(no subject)
Oct. 21st, 2002 11:23 amugg fuck fuck fuck
so I have my midterm exam
for my informal logic class
almost complete
there is one section
in which he tells us
to find and analyze an argument
which commits one of the following sins:
Denying the Antecedent,
Affirming the Consequent,
False Dilemma
Arguing Backwards with "All"
Arguing Backwards with "No"
Reasoning in a Chain with "Some".
it is due in 40 minutes
and
for the life of me
I cant find one
this section is worth
20 points out of 110 points
and
I am not going to get em
cause
I dont know anyone dumb enough
to write such a fallacious argument
I have spent the last four hours
trolling the net
trying to find any sort of substantial argument
where one of the above errors are made
so far either people have their shit together
enough not to make the errors
[
elitedebate for example]
or
for the most part are unable to even put
together an argument coherent enough
to contain said fallacies
fuck I am frustrated
so I have my midterm exam
for my informal logic class
almost complete
there is one section
in which he tells us
to find and analyze an argument
which commits one of the following sins:
Denying the Antecedent,
Affirming the Consequent,
False Dilemma
Arguing Backwards with "All"
Arguing Backwards with "No"
Reasoning in a Chain with "Some".
it is due in 40 minutes
and
for the life of me
I cant find one
this section is worth
20 points out of 110 points
and
I am not going to get em
cause
I dont know anyone dumb enough
to write such a fallacious argument
I have spent the last four hours
trolling the net
trying to find any sort of substantial argument
where one of the above errors are made
so far either people have their shit together
enough not to make the errors
[
or
for the most part are unable to even put
together an argument coherent enough
to contain said fallacies
fuck I am frustrated