theorem on groups and their relative intelligence

[plural]

pondering this
a while
and well it
came up today
so
I thought
I would
scribble something here

I believe
that groups inherently
detract from the individual intelligence
of those who comprise that group.

for example

a soccer fan may be intelligent
but a stadium full of soccer fans
would lose to a pile of rocks
in the brains dept.
(don't get me started on football fans)

the difficulty for me
is determining the exact ratio of loss

it is obvious that
in sufficiently large groups
intelligence is reduce to zero
hence
the colloquial use of
"President Bush"

I would
propose the following
formula for determining group intelligence

average the IQ scores of the people in the group
and subtract 1 point of IQ from the average for
each member of the group

for our purposes we define a group
as three or more people

Comments

I have noticed..

[zaiah.livejournal.com]

NO ONE uses the term "President Bush" simply the "Bush Administration". I wonder how much of that is the subconscious choice of the media to be truthful that he's not the one in charge?

Also excluded from use in the world broadcasts I've listened to "President of the United States" to the "United State's Bush Administration"

Re: I have noticed..

[ex-tanstaafl888.livejournal.com]

which president in modern times (or any time for that matter) actually WAS in charge of anything?

Re: I have noticed.. amended

[ex-tanstaafl888.livejournal.com]

Realize, of course, that ll the presidents thus far have been married... and.. like Hillary did... the wives have had good control over their puppets.